By Gordon Rugg
Researchers in various relevant disciplines have started writing about the M&Z paper. The responses I’ve seen so far vary from sceptical to scathing, as described below.
I’m planning to hand over to the specialists from other fields, since I’ve already covered my concerns about this study in previous blog posts, and to return to the usual subjects of this blog.
There’s a scathing review of the Montemurro and Zanette paper here:
Some key quotes from that review: